Free tools · Safety
Safety culture survey
16 statements about how work really happens at your site. For each, pick the answer closest to what people do, not what the policy says. The result places you on the safety culture ladder, from pathological to generative. Best used by asking several people at different levels and comparing answers.
Your result
Answer the statements and press See my result. Unanswered statements are left out.
Where to act first
Basis and sources
The five rungs come from the safety culture maturity model by Hudson and colleagues, used in the Energy Institute Hearts and Minds programme. The rung descriptions below are paraphrased. Each answer is scored 1 (pathological) to 5 (generative). The average, rounded to the nearest whole number, gives your rung. The statements and this scoring are a Verdaqa screening method, not the published survey instrument.
- Pathological. Who cares as long as we are not caught. Safety is seen as a cost and a barrier to production.
- Reactive. Safety is important, and we do a lot every time we have an accident. Action follows incidents.
- Calculative. We have systems in place to manage all hazards. Lots of data and audits, driven by management.
- Proactive. We work on the problems that we still find. The workforce is involved and leaders act before harm.
- Generative. Safety is how we do business round here. Bad news is welcomed and people look for weak signals.
Email me the full report
We send your results with notes on what they mean and what to do next. No spam.